RSS Aggregator

LoCloud is a Best Practice Network of 32 partners, co-funded under the CIP ICT-PSP Programme of the [...]

More and more of us are moving to tools such as Google Apps for Educators, Chromebooks, and mobile d [...]

(3) metadata entry Contribution: Susanne Uhlirz Name: Susanne Uhlirz URL: link to the original post [...]

Benjamin ŠTULAR (Institute of archaeology, Slovene Academy of Science and Arts, Slovenia) Purpose: U [...]

Alexander A. MALAFEEV (Samara Branch of Moscow State University of Service, Russia) Stormy developme [...]

Andrey V. BIRIUKOV, Michail A. RODIONOV (Samara Branch of Higher School of Privatization and Enterpr [...]

Vladimir I. IONESOV / Natalia G. LEVINA (Samara Branch of Moscow State University of Service, Russia [...]

Vladimir I. IONESOV (Samara Branch of Moscow State University of Service, Russia) The Bronze Age was [...]

Chair: Masha VUKANOVIC, Serbia Finding, processing and preserving cultural heritage could be seen as [...]

Anatoly V. MALAFEEV / Galina I. ZABOLOTNI / Vladimir I. IONESOV (Samara Branch of Moscow State Unive [...]

Mohamed EL AMROUSI (United Arab Emirates University) Museums as architectural manifestations of elit [...]

Learn about Heather Dewey-Hagborg’sStranger Visions (2) metadata entry Contribution: The Alliance [...]

This post is by Sarah McSeveny-Åril, senior advisor digital cultural heritage at the Arts Council Eu [...]

The show was awash in quick, smart wisecracks, not to mention cultural references that ran the gamut [...]

Top Subscribed RSS

Top Contributors

Digital humanities and the revenge of ‘old school’

This is my last post of the year (and many of you may sigh in relief). And I am going to write about the debates about the DH as a field again, and my own shifting perspectives. I think ideas such as ‘the methodological commons’ and ‘collaboration’ as justification for the ‘field’ are exhausted concepts, and far from unique and special, they are now becoming hackneyed. They have become weak concepts that lend themselves to exploitation by the condottiere (ie. anything for anybody anywhere). The condottiere were a band of mercenaries common in Europe between the 14th and 16th centuries, one could argue that there ‘methodological commons’ serves a similar purpose in the DH.

MethodologicalCommons2-1024x723I think that a better understanding of DH would be in terms of the ‘revenge of old school’.  And by old school, I don’t mean the economically elite, but the very old fashioned cultural elite (the Tweed set). They are not such bad people (very polite and well-mannered) and they have been on the back foot to Modernity, especially the American type, for quite some time.  This is the where the DH comes to the rescue. It brings ‘old school’ to the masses. Working class kids (like me) tortured in our youth by years of mushy social science, cultural studies, internet studies, two-minute noodles, and VB Beer, now have (critical) access to the digital record of the most important documents in Western history.  This is democracy at its finest.  

The greatest contribution that the DH has made to date is that it ‘democratised’ old school.  It disrupts the classic class-system in Australia (exacerbated by education) where middle-class prats can’t use computers and working class prats don’t know who Shakespeare is.  The DH combines, in one person, Shakespeare and the computer, old school and new school, thus it is classless (…?).

See you next year!


metadata entry

Contribution: Craig

Name: Craig

URL: link to the original post


Language: English

Format: text/html